Blog

What is TPD insurance ?

In simple terms, this is a life insurance product that can be an important financial safety net and pays a lump-sum payment if an illness or injury permanently stops you from earning an income.  Using a simple example, imagine you’re a dentist. If you develop:

1. severe arthritis in your hands,
2. a neurological condition,
3. major vision loss,
4. or a serious mental health condition,

and you can no longer work as a dentist permanently, a TPD policy may pay a lump sum such as $500,000 or $1 million or $2 million+ depending on the amount of cover you purchased.

What is money from a TPD claim used for?

Claimants can use the money at their discretion and common uses include :

1. Pay off their mortgage.
2. Clearing other personal debts.
3. Replacing future lost income.
4. Funding medical treatment and rehabilitation.
5. Supporting their family.

 

Claims Examples

Experien Insurance Services have helped many clients to get TPD claims from a range of insurers. Some examples are shown below showing the occupation, cause of claim, insurer and payment.

1. Doctor ; Stroke ; Asteron ; Over $1m
2. Optometrist ; Rheumatoid Arthritis ; TAL ; Over $1m
3. Vet ; Recreational accident ; TAL ; Over $1m
4. Surgeon ; Neurological issue ; Clearview ; Over $2.5m
5. Dentist ; Multiple Sclerosis ; AIA ; Over $2m
6. Dental Hygenist ; Hand injury ; MLC ; Over $3m
7. Dentist ; Cancer ; Asteron ; Over $500k
8. Vet ; Cancer ; Asteron ; Over $300k
9. Dentist ; Cancer ; ClearView ; Over $750k

 How is TPD insurance different from Income Protection Insurance ?

Income Protection

1. Commonly pays a monthly income
2. For temporary or ongoing disability
3. Usually pays up to 70% of income
4. Stops when you recover or benefit period ends
5. Whilst both products are commonly issued by life insurers, the tax treatment of premiums and claims often differ between the two products.

TPD

1. Commonly pays one lump sum
2. For permanent disability
3. Can pay hundreds of thousands or millions
4. Commonly a one-off payment

Whilst both products are commonly issued by life insurers, the tax treatment of premiums and claims often differ between the two products.

What are some of the features that differentiate types of TPD policies ?

“Own Occupation” vs “Any Occupation” definitions of TPD can make a big difference in whether some claims get paid or not.  It is generally easier to claim on an “Own” occupation definition and this cover is more expensive.

Own Occupation TPD

You are paid if you cannot perform your own profession. For example:

1. You are a dentist.
2. Hand tremors prevent you from practising dentistry.
3. You could still teach at university.
4. An Own occupation policy may still pay because you can no longer work as a dentist.

Any Occupation TPD

You are only paid if you cannot work in any occupation reasonably suited by your education, training and experience. Using the same example:

1. You cannot practise dentistry.
2. But you could work as a lecturer, consultant or administrator.
3. An any occupation policy may not pay.

This is why many professionals value own-occupation TPD.  These are general references and you should always read the Product Disclosure Statement of the insurer issuing the TPD cover to see the detailed terms of that product.

What conditions commonly lead to TPD claims ?

The biggest causes are:

1. Back and spinal injuries.
2. Cancer.
3. Heart disease.
4. Neurological conditions.
5. Mental health conditions such as severe depression, PTSD and anxiety disorders.

 Where do Australians get TPD cover?

Usually either:

1. Inside their main superannuation fund

1. 1. Cover may be automatically provided.
   2. Cover may be for a low amount (eg $150,000)
   3. Usually “any-occupation” cover.
2. Retail policies arranged with an insurance broker

1. 1. More flexible coverage with several options.
   2. You choose your preferred sum insured
   3. Can provide “own-occupation” definitions.
   4. Often used by professionals such as doctors and dentists.

 What are the trends in the Australian Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) insurance market ?

At the time of writing, the industry is going through one of its biggest shifts in decades. The dominant themes are rising mental health claims, affordability pressures, sustainability concerns, and increasing regulatory scrutiny.

The traditional TPD model is evolving

Historically, TPD insurance was designed around:

1. Catastrophic injury.
2. Permanent physical disability or illness.
3. A clear inability to ever return to work.
4. A single lump-sum benefit intended to repay debt, fund retirement, and compensate for lost income.

This worked reasonably well when most claims arose from severe physical injuries and illnesses. However, today’s claims profile is increasingly dominated by mental health conditions and chronic illnesses that may fluctuate over time.   Objectively measuring permanence and severity of some conditions can be challenging.

Mental health claims are the fastest-growing type of TPD claim

The most significant trend is the growth in TPD claims related to mental illness, including depression, PTSD and anxiety disorders.

1. Mental health now accounts for roughly one-third of TPD claims paid in Australia.
2. One life insurer reported that mental health-related TPD claims on one product increased by 60% over three years, far exceeding insured number growth.
3. Industry participants have highlighted that TPD claims involving people in their 30s linked to mental health have risen by more than 700% over the past decade.

This is challenging insurers because TPD products were originally designed around permanent physical disabilities, not complex and often episodic psychological conditions.

Sustainability of TPD insurance is a growing concern

Insurers, reinsurers, regulators and actuaries are increasingly questioning whether current TPD product designs remain sustainable in terms of pricing and profitability. Key concerns include:

1. Rising claim frequencies.
2. Larger claim costs.
3. Mental health claim complexity.
4. Potential over-insurance when TPD is combined with other benefits.
5. Difficulties determining objectively whether a condition is truly “permanent”.

APRA has publicly stated that TPD is being “asked to solve an issue it was never built to address” and is encouraging the industry to rethink product design.

Premiums are increasing

As claim costs rise, the cost of providing TPD cover has increased.  For advisers and policyholders, this means greater attention is being paid to obtaining the right amount of cover and reviewing cover structures regularly.

Musculoskeletal conditions remain a major driver

While mental health receives increasing attention, physical disabilities, such as back injuries, spinal conditions and chronic pain remain a large category of TPD claims. Serious diseases such as cancer and heart disease also account for a large proportion of claims.

Greater scrutiny of claims handling

Regulators and consumer groups continue to focus on how TPD claims are assessed.  Recent developments include:

1. APRA’s ongoing publication of insurer claims and disputes statistics.
2. ASIC reviews of insurance in superannuation.
3. Public concern around delays in some TPD claims through superannuation funds.

The industry is under pressure to improve assessment timeframes, communication with members and support for vulnerable claimants, especially those with mental illness.

More scrutiny of insurance offered by superannuation funds

Many Australians hold TPD cover through their main superannuation fund. Insurers and regulators and fund trustees are increasingly examining:

1. whether default cover levels remain appropriate,
2. member value for money,
3. claims outcomes,
4. and insurance design within super funds.

This trend is likely to continue as trustees face stronger obligations to demonstrate that insurance arrangements are delivering good member outcomes.

Product redesign is being discussed by industry participants

A criticism of traditional TPD is that it effectively offers only two outcomes:

1. Claim accepted → full lump sum.
2. Claim declined → no benefit.

Industry discussions are increasingly debating more graduated support structures. These could include:

1. Partial disability benefits.
2. Transitional benefits.
3. Rehabilitation funding.
4. Return-to-work support.
5. Improved support for mental health conditions,
6. Alternative benefit structures instead of a single large lump sum, and
7. Alternative assessment criteria to approve claims

This could make TPD look less like a binary event and more like a continuum of support.

Greater integration with income protection

Industry discussions have considered the need to better integrate:

1. Income Protection (IP)
2. TPD, and
3. Rehabilitation services

Currently, a claimant may receive an income protection benefit for several years before lodging a TPD claim.  Some industry participants believe there should be:

1. Earlier intervention.
2. Better rehabilitation outcomes.
3. Stronger incentives to remain attached to the workforce where possible.

For professionals such as dentists and doctors, this could eventually mean a more coordinated pathway from temporary disability through to permanent disability assessment.

Re-thinking mental health claims

Mental health is big driver of product redesign discussions.  Key concerns include:

1. Conditions may be episodic.
2. Recovery trajectories are often uncertain.
3. Permanency is harder to assess.
4. A lump-sum payment may not always produce the best long-term outcome.

As a result, insurers are exploring products that provide:

1. Ongoing support.
2. Rehabilitation assistance.
3. Structured recovery pathways.
4. Better alignment with fluctuating capacity to work such as instalment payments

Tighter control of over-insurance amounts

Another trend is addressing situations where combined benefits exceed economic loss.

Industry reviews have highlighted concerns that some people may hold:

1. TPD cover.
2. Income protection cover.
3. Trauma cover.
4. Superannuation insurance.

All potentially responding to the same event. Future product design may consider :

1. Better justification of sums insured.
2. Stronger links to financial need.
3. Improved management of replacement ratios.

For high-income professionals, this doesn’t necessarily mean less cover, but insurers may apply more rigorous financial underwriting.

Increased use of rehabilitation and early intervention

A major shift occurring globally and increasingly discussed in Australia is moving resources upstream.  Instead of focusing only on claim assessment after someone becomes permanently disabled, insurers are exploring:

1. Early treatment support.
2. Psychological services.
3. Vocational rehabilitation.
4. Return-to-work assistance.

The objective is to improve health outcomes while reducing the number of claims that ultimately become permanent disabilities.

Possible evolution from lump sums to hybrid models

One long-term option is a move away from pure lump-sum TPD.  Some industry participants are discussing hybrid structures which could combine:

1. A smaller lump sum.
2. Ongoing income streams.
3. Rehabilitation funding.
4. Care and support services.

Legislative constraints currently limit how quickly these changes can occur, particularly within superannuation. APRA has noted that some reforms would require government involvement rather than simply insurer action.

What to watch out for ?

For professionals, the biggest likely developments over the next 5–10 years are:

1. Pricing changes on TPD insurance premiums
2. For those who have automatic cover issued by their superannuation fund, a reminder that insurance product features can change unilaterally by the trustees in those superannuation funds and members should be aware of any regression in cover
3. Own-occupation TPD cover remains highly valuable, but availability and pricing may continue to evolve.
4. More stringent financial underwriting for new large TPD sums insured that are applied for.  Or if moving cover from one insurer to another.
5. Mental health becoming more relevant in underwriting discussions for new or replacement cover.
6. Greater integration of TPD and income protection in terms of claims and sums insured. Insurers are paying closer attention to income replacement ratios and potential over-insurance.
7. Alternative approach to mental health claim design and support for new or replacement cover.
8. Potential emergence of hybrid TPD products that blend lump sums with ongoing payments/assessment and ongoing support
9. Possible legislative changes such as allowing insurers to fund some medical treatment costs from a TPD rehabilitation program benefit

This is general information and limited in its scope.  If you are considering buying or replacing and a Life Insurance policy then contact us to arrange a review for you. We can consider your individual circumstances, goals and needs and recommend a suitable insurer, product and structure to use. We work with several insurers and have extensive experience in helping to arrange claims.

At the time of writing, Life insurance and Financial Advice services are provided by Experien Insurance Services Pty Ltd (EIS) ABN 99 128 678 937 and Experien Financial Services Pty Ltd (EFS) ABN 32 631 346 757. EIS and EFS are a Corporate Authorised Representative (No. 320626 and No. 1274354) Count Financial Limited ABN 19 001 974 625, AFSL 227232. See our website for our Financial Services Guide and latest AFSL arrangements. Always read the Product Disclosure Statement issued by an Insurer before considering insurance.